The only thing that Mike Rounds seems to be able to say in tonight's debate on KELO is that a vote for any of my opponents is a vote for Barak Obama; however, when asked if he would support repealing the EB-5 program all he could say was that we should look at it. That is clear politician speak for I will give a wink and a nod to the program and still use it to line mine and my friend's pockets.
All of the candidates other than Mike Rounds were clear that this program was failed because of corruption. Larry Pressler, Rick Weiland, and Gordan Howie say no to EB-5. Mike Rounds says yes to EB-5. We should trust Mike Rounds because,... because,... oh shoot, I can't think of a reason.
Here is a man that says that he investigates things like the Keystone pipeline that could destroy the South Dakota's main aquifer by asking the people that want to build Keystone XL for technical advice. "I mean, why would they lie about something like that," say Round. I think this statement tells you everything you need to know about Mike Rounds and his ability to lead and to support South Dakotans in the Senate.
So remember, a vote for Mike Rounds is a vote for EB-5 and anything else big business wants because why would they lie?
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Daugaard's Salary Should Be Set at $3,200 a Year
Daugaard likes to compare apples and oranges when it comes to education as an excuse to keep teacher pay so low. It is only fair that he should live under the same logic. When you compare Daugaard's performance in office with that of the Lennox mayor, it is clear that Daugaard is getting paid way too much money.
The salary for mayor in Lennox is $3,200 a year and $40 per special meeting. Daugaard's salary is $98,000.
Lennox has experienced less crime, has a lower unemployment rate, the local school's ACT test scores are slightly higher than the state average, the roads in the town are in about as good of shape as the roads around the state, and while we too have issues surrounding favoritism, the town of Lennox has never given tens of millions of dollars to recruit businesses to have them go belly up.
By all measurements, the Mayor of Lennox is doing much better than the Governor. There is no reason to pay him this outrageous salary. $3,200 should be more than enough to compensate him for the work he has done.
The salary for mayor in Lennox is $3,200 a year and $40 per special meeting. Daugaard's salary is $98,000.
Lennox has experienced less crime, has a lower unemployment rate, the local school's ACT test scores are slightly higher than the state average, the roads in the town are in about as good of shape as the roads around the state, and while we too have issues surrounding favoritism, the town of Lennox has never given tens of millions of dollars to recruit businesses to have them go belly up.
By all measurements, the Mayor of Lennox is doing much better than the Governor. There is no reason to pay him this outrageous salary. $3,200 should be more than enough to compensate him for the work he has done.
Monday, October 27, 2014
Only Daugaard Could Pull Me Back In
I had taken a much needed break from blogging. School had started. The debate season is soon approaching and that has meant that I have spent nearly 50-60 hours at the school building between teaching, coaching, and helping referring volleyball. My boys are involved in Boy Scouts, going to sporting events in town, and basic life. It was nice to avoid taking an hour or more in writing a blog that is researched and deliberate (for the most part). The Democrats are on life support with Rick Weiland. Corrina Robinson has not been able to mount anything resembling a real campaign and Susan Wismer is not much better. I was prepared to accept a Republican sweep; not happy about it but prepared to accept it.
Then Dennis Daugaard opened his mouth and pulled me back into the fray. If there was ever any doubt about how Dennis Daugaard views educators and about how ignorant Dennis Daugaard is when it comes to the field of education, he has slammed shut the door on those uncertainties. In an interview with the Argus Leader, Daugaard is quoted:
At the private school that I taught many years ago, there was no special education department. We didn't have IEPs. Students whose needs that could not be met went to the public school in the town. These students came from mostly stable homes. The majority of them would be considered middle class families or high income families. The overwhelming majority of the students were Caucasian. That could not be said for the public school in Storm Lake, Iowa. It is ridiculous to even think that the challenges faced by teachers in that school were the same as the ones I faced in the private school.
He then goes to the same old drivel of how it is not the state that sets teacher pay, it is the schools that set it.
Daugaard will win next week. This is true. What else is going to be true is that Daugaard will do everything in his power to humiliate and belittle the education field. We must turn our focus not on Daugaard who will have no one to answer to except the business elite that control him, but instead on the Senators and Representatives that must at least answer to the people every two years.
I think the feeling is best summed up by teacher and parent of an O'Gorman student, Travis Dahle, who posted on Facebook:
Then Dennis Daugaard opened his mouth and pulled me back into the fray. If there was ever any doubt about how Dennis Daugaard views educators and about how ignorant Dennis Daugaard is when it comes to the field of education, he has slammed shut the door on those uncertainties. In an interview with the Argus Leader, Daugaard is quoted:
In an interview last week with 100 Eyes Daugaard said: "You can't say that you won't obtain quality without high compensation. I was just at O'Gorman (High School). The teachers at O'Gorman are paid, as a group, less than the Sioux Falls School District. Their students achieve better."Daugaard was always a supporter of the private school system in Dell Raipids. Most of his children went through the private school until of course it could not offer something that a child wanted and then he turned to the public system. I have no qualms with private schools. I taught at a private school in my first year of teaching. The ignorance that Daugaard shows is that he thinks that the population at a private school like O'Gorman is the same as the population at Sioux Falls Washington.
At the private school that I taught many years ago, there was no special education department. We didn't have IEPs. Students whose needs that could not be met went to the public school in the town. These students came from mostly stable homes. The majority of them would be considered middle class families or high income families. The overwhelming majority of the students were Caucasian. That could not be said for the public school in Storm Lake, Iowa. It is ridiculous to even think that the challenges faced by teachers in that school were the same as the ones I faced in the private school.
He then goes to the same old drivel of how it is not the state that sets teacher pay, it is the schools that set it.
"The state doesn't control teacher pay," Daugaard said. "To point the finger at the state and say you are the problem here, it just, it's not accurate. If (school districts) want to spend more money for teacher pay, that's what they can do."I AM SO SICK OF THIS LINE OF CRAP! I appreciate my school board. They are very frugal with the money that they have available to control. When you only give school districts a certain amount of money, that money must be set aside to pay for all of the normal operating expenses. When districts get some additional money, guess what the vast majority do with it: Give it to teachers as a means to increase salaries. Daugaard controls what teachers get paid and clearly thinks that teacher gets far too much money right now.
Daugaard will win next week. This is true. What else is going to be true is that Daugaard will do everything in his power to humiliate and belittle the education field. We must turn our focus not on Daugaard who will have no one to answer to except the business elite that control him, but instead on the Senators and Representatives that must at least answer to the people every two years.
I think the feeling is best summed up by teacher and parent of an O'Gorman student, Travis Dahle, who posted on Facebook:
Dennis Daugaard - you owe an apology to every single teacher and student in this state. I may have disagreed with some of your policies, but I at least respected you in the past. That ship has sailed. If ANY educator thinks that this person should be re-elected, then you should leave the profession now.Daugaard is an enemy of public education. He has never, ever shown any respect for education. When you wonder why some districts are struggling to fill positions, the management of the state by Daugaard is the key reason. Daugaard may win, but he should get zero percent of the education vote: ZERO!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)